The objectives of this research were 1) to study the participation of people with the election of Nasarn Sub-District Administration Organization, Praprom District, Nakhonsrithammarat Province, regarding to the measurement and the criterion for Office of the Permanent Secretary for Interior 2) to compare the participation of people with the election of Nasarn Sub-District Administration Organization, Praprom District, Nakhonsrithammarat Province, classified by personal factors, 3) to study the problems, the solutions and suggestions of the participation of people with the election of Nasarn Sub-District Administration Organization Praprom District, Nakhonsrithammarat Province. This research was the mixed research both quantitative and qualitative research. The sampling population were consisted of the people whose age of 20 years upward, selecting 360 residents of the 3,629 total population. The methodology provided Taro Yamane formula for the sampling population. The data analysis performed by a computer program for social science research and following statistics such as : frequency, percentage, Mean and Standard Deviation for describing and testing hypotheses by the personal factors. The t-test results were the differences between the two groups. F-test was done by means of analyzing, One Way ANOVA was tested the difference of Means from the three groups upward. The test of the differences Means in each pair was done by the Least Significant Difference: LSD. The qualitative research method used the in-depth interview with the key informants ,collaborating the context by the content analysis technique.
The research findings were as follows:
1) The participation of people with the election of Nasarn Sub-District Administration Organization, Praprom District, Nakhonsrithammarat Province was overall opinion in the high level ( =3.60), and considering the high level in all aspects. Means arranged respectively from maximum to minimum as follows: receiving information ( =3.59), following the campaign ( =3.29), communicating with the politician and giving the opinion ( =2.89).
2) The opinion compared on the participation of people with the election of Nasarn Sub-District Administration Organization, Praprom District, Nakhonsrithammarat Province classified by personal factors such as gender, age, education, occupation, and income average per year found that people with gender, age, education level had different opinion on the participation of people with the election of Nasarn Sub-District Administration Organization, Praprom District, Nakhonsrithammarat Province. Whereas the population who had different income and positions were found different opinion in the significance at level 0.05.The personnel who had different of sex, age, education, monthly income and marital status had no different opinion on the participation of people with the election of Nasarn Sub-District Administration Organization.
3) The problems, solutions and the suggestions of the participation of people with the election of Nasarn Sub-District Administration Organization, Praprom District, Nakhonsrithammarat Province found that the population didn’t receive enough information and slow with the incident. In the aspect of following the campaign, the population did not follow the campaign of politicians regarding to lack of public relation and scarcely action in political motion. In the aspect of contact with the population, the politicians rarely focused and contacted on the people, hardly communicate and less contact to the public. The suggestion of the politicians should develop in public relations, the information should be comprehensive, modern, and accessible thorough in all areas of the community.
|
